Blog Single
Posted by:
Comments:
Post Date:
Two Ways of Showing Up
I had been procrastinating on my first TikTok video for three months.
When I finally sat down to film it, I came prepared with a script, a list of credentials, and a rigid internal standard about how a professional should present himself online. I wanted to establish legitimacy properly. I wanted to sound credible, competent, serious.
My wife sat nearby listening for less than thirty seconds before interrupting.
“Drop the script,” she said. “Nobody cares about your credentials. Just be authentic. Like the people who’ve already made 200 videos.”
I immediately pushed back.
They already had followings, I argued. I was starting from zero. I needed to build trust first. I needed structure. Context. Professionalism.
Underneath the argument were two very different ways of organizing the self. One part of me believed worth had to be earned through competence and careful presentation. Another part, the one my wife kept insisting on, wanted to speak more naturally, imperfectly, spontaneously.
But looking back, I can also see that my wife was operating from a kind of unrelenting standard of her own. To her, authenticity was non-negotiable. “Be natural or don’t do it at all” carried its own rigidity, its own uncompromising line about what counted as the only acceptable form of self-expression.
The conflict was not simply between standards and freedom. It was between two competing standards of how a person should appear in the world.
The tension resembled what Gestalt therapists sometimes call a topdog/underdog split: one part demanding polished legitimacy, another resisting performance altogether. But the deeper process may have been closer to what Gestalt therapy calls creative adjustment, where genuine contact with another person disrupts an old adaptation and allows something more alive to emerge.
At the time, though, it just felt irritating.
The Recording I Couldn’t Edit
I didn’t delete the first recording.
In the video, you can hear my wife in the background calling my performance “so fake” while I laugh defensively, touch my chest dramatically, and insist that I’m not going to edit her voice out.
The first take was visibly uncomfortable. That was precisely why I kept it.
Part of me recognized, even then, that the awkwardness mattered. Most people only show the polished version that comes after the reorganization. Rarely do we see the actual moment an old way of being stops working in real time.
The tension in that recording was not simply failure. Something rigid was beginning to lose its grip.
Afterward, I filmed a second version. No script. No performance voice. No attempt to sound especially impressive. I let the uncertainty stay visible.
The second video flowed almost immediately.
But the shift had started before the second recording.
Emptying the Drawers
Earlier that day, frustrated and restless, I had emptied several drawers searching for a spanner.
I pulled everything out onto the floor: tools, cables, forgotten objects, random clutter. The room became a mess that felt strangely purposeful.
I couldn’t find what I was looking for.
Eventually, I mentioned it aloud to my wife and our maid. Someone else saw the search, saw the disorder, and handed me exactly what I needed, but only after I had already exhausted where it wasn’t.
Looking back, the physical search mirrored the psychological one.
I had been trying to create order by tightening control. But the breakthrough only came after the existing organization had been disrupted enough for other possibilities to emerge. Sometimes the whole cupboard has to be emptied before something new can be found.
The Dream Continued the Argument
That night, I had a dream.
I was a scout on a mission. My partner wandered away. I waited for her to return.
When she finally came back, I repeatedly stamped my foot into a rigid posture of attention and said:
“Do you know I could have left you?”
She replied:
“Then why didn’t you?”
And I answered:
“Because only a muse would understand why I didn’t leave.”
When I woke up, the dream felt emotionally obvious.
The rigid, foot-stamping figure carried the same energy as the part of me that needed everything done correctly. But the wandering partner represented something else: spontaneity, unpredictability, relational aliveness.
The dream did not resolve the tension by eliminating one side. Instead, something unexpected happened. The rigid part recognized value in the other.
“Only a muse would understand.”
It was almost a reluctant compliment. Somewhere underneath the frustration, my psyche recognized that my wife’s insistence on authenticity was not casual preference. It was conviction. She was protecting something she considered essential.
In Chinese culture, there is an idiom, 对牛弹琴, “playing the flute to a cow,” offering something meaningful to someone incapable of understanding it. But the dream suggested something different entirely: playing the flute to a muse.
The paradox was that the muse was not asking the flute player to perform perfectly. She was asking him to stop gripping the flute so tightly. To stop following the script so rigidly. To play freely enough for something alive to emerge.
Not perform the music, but to live it.
Why Relationship Changes Us
Looking back, the breakthrough was not caused by insight alone. It emerged relationally.
What changed me was not simply being criticized. It was being challenged while the relationship itself remained intact.
My wife did not withdraw. She did not reassure me into staying comfortable. But she also did not humiliate or abandon me. She stayed present while refusing to fully collude with the performed version of me.
That distinction matters.
In psychoanalytic terms, this begins to resemble what Wilfred Bion called containment: the capacity for emotionally overwhelming states to become more thinkable because they are received and held rather than immediately rejected or escalated.
But Donald Winnicott’s idea of a holding environment may fit even more closely here. The transformation did not happen because someone interpreted me brilliantly. It happened because awkwardness, defensiveness, frustration, and imperfection were allowed to exist inside relationship without the self collapsing entirely into shame.
From a Gestalt perspective, something else was happening too. The script, the credentials, the performance voice, all of it functioned as a way of organizing contact before contact had actually occurred. Rather than meeting the audience directly, I was trying to control the conditions of exposure in advance. The performance interrupted the natural cycle of contact before genuine encounter could fully emerge.
The argument became survivable, and because it became survivable, it became usable. The conflict itself eventually became part of the authenticity of the video.
Recognizing the Bottom of the U
What interests me most now, both personally and clinically, is how often genuine change initially looks like deterioration.
Developmental researchers have long observed that growth is rarely linear. Many systems appear to follow nonlinear, U-shaped trajectories in which temporary disorganization precedes higher-order integration.
We see this in infant development. Early coordination often becomes unstable before more sophisticated coordination emerges. A child learning language babbles incoherently before speech becomes organized. Motor systems destabilize before new movement patterns consolidate.
Family systems often work similarly. Existing homeostasis resists disruption until something destabilizes the pattern strongly enough for reorganization to occur.
The difficult part is that, from the inside, the destabilization rarely feels hopeful. It feels like failure.
What matters clinically is learning to distinguish destructive collapse from transitional disorganization. From the outside, both can look messy. But experienced therapists sometimes recognize something important in these moments: the bottom of the U.
Old strategies stop working before new capacities stabilize. The previous organization is dissolving, but the new one has not yet cohered.
At this stage, the task is not immediate repair. The task is helping someone remain in contact long enough for reorganization to occur.
This changes how we understand therapeutic progress entirely.
A client whose old coping strategies are falling apart may not simply be deteriorating. A person who suddenly feels more emotionally disorganized after years of rigid functioning may not be “getting worse.” Sometimes the system is finally becoming flexible enough to reorganize.
The messiness is not separate from the work.
The messiness is the work.
When Standards Become Armor
What surprised me most is that neither of our standards were actually the enemy.
Mine defended competence. Hers defended authenticity. Both were attempts to protect something deeply valued.
Schema therapy describes unrelenting standards as the persistent pressure to meet rigid internal expectations, often tied to fears of inadequacy, shame, or loss of worth. Usually we imagine these standards appearing as perfectionism, achievement, or hyper-competence. But authenticity itself can also become an unrelenting standard: the pressure to appear completely natural, emotionally real, unperformed at all times.
That was part of the paradox between us. I was trying to avoid being perceived as incompetent. She was trying to avoid anything that felt performative or false. Both positions carried anxiety underneath them.
But rigid standards rarely soften through more force. They soften through contact. Through relationships capable of holding tension without immediately resolving it. Through moments where the self can become temporarily disorganized without being abandoned.
The standards did not disappear. They became less armored because they no longer had to stand alone.
Staying Long Enough to Reorganize
I used to think change happened when people finally figured themselves out.
Now I think it often begins much earlier, at the point where the old performance stops working but the new way of being still feels uncertain.
The living room argument. The drawers emptied onto the floor. The awkward first recording. The dream that continued the conversation overnight.
All of them were expressions of the same process: disorganization in the presence of relationship.
And maybe that is what real change often looks like before it becomes visible as growth. Not graceful transformation, but two people staying in contact long enough for something more alive to emerge.
#GestaltTherapy #SchemaTherapy #UnrelentingStandards #Psychotherapy #Authenticity #CreativeAdjustment #Containment #HoldingEnvironment #RelationalHealing #TherapeuticChange #EmotionalDevelopment #UShapedDevelopment #PersonalGrowth
